tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC June 18, 2018 9:00pm-10:00pm PDT
i got to tell you we have two very, very, very good guests joining us on the show tonight. a pulitzer prize winning reporter who cracked open a huge, new story in the biggest story in the country. she is joining us here in just a moment. we've also got a second guest here tonight who's a legitimate american hero. she's someone who broke open another one of the biggest stories in the country and not as a reporter but as a doctor. her story is amazing. she is here tonight for the interview. you heard chris hayes just say that his show tomorrow night is going to be live from near the u.s./mexico border in texas. we are also joined tonight by a congressman who's now running for senate in texas who represents a border community and who's been leading the
political response to what's been happening on the border including an incredible march that happened yesterday on the tent city, encampment they have put up near the border to house kids. so, we have a lot to get to. a lot's going on. in april, president trump issued a proclamation calling for national guard troops sent to the u.s./mexico border. he did not order national guard troops to the border. he didn't direct them to go under the authority, didn't federalize them. they're under the control of the governors of all states and he issued a proclamation telling the governor to send guardsmen and lots of governors did and troops have gone on these domestic deployments down to the border region because the president asked and not entirely clear what troops can effectively do at the border. that border patrol and local law enforcement can't do. there there's not that clear of
a mission for the national guards men and women sent from all over the country. just a few days ago, politico.com had this headline. trump ordered troops to the border but they're doing busywork. so president trump sending troops to the border has not been a rollicking policy success. nobody know what is they're doing there and not the most controversial thing in the world either. troops, they do get called on to do all sorts of stuff. there have been previous instances of previous presidents sending national guard troops to the border for specific deployments to help with specific stuff. today, though, the governor of massachusetts who is a republican, he announced today that he is rescinding his previous decision to send massachusetts national guard troops down to the border in response to president trump asking. governor charlie baker of massachusetts, again, a republican, announced today that he is canceling the massachusetts national guard border deployment. a statement from the governor's
communication director said, quote, governor baker directed the national guard to not send any assets or personnel to the southwest border today because of the federal government's current actions which are resulting in the inhumane treatment of children. governor baker had previously criticized the trump administration's policy of taking kids from the parents at the border. he was asked about in it a radio interview last month. at which point he said he had a, quote, huge problem with that and not until today he decided to put his state's money where his mouth is. and today he ordered a stop on the planned deployment of massachusetts national guard troops under the control. they will no longer be going down there to participate. so that was massachusetts today where there's a republican governor. in colorado today where there's a democratic governor governor john hickenlooper signed an executive order to limit the funds.
quote, no state agency may use any state resources including but not limited to moneys, equipment or perm for the purpose of separating any child from his or her parent or legal guardian on the sole ground that the parent or legal guardian is present in the united states. it says the u.s. department of homeland security policy and practice of separating children from the parents arriving at the southern border is offensive to our core values and as a country. now, as a practical matter, were significant state resources from the state of colorado being used before today? to help effectuate the trump administration policy of taking kids away from the parents? no idea. just like we don't know if those massachusetts national guard troops who would have been sent to the border, we don't know if they would have been doing anything other than busywork behind the scenes in the now
canceled deployment. with what the two governors did today and actions like these two parties and states you can see the same dynamic at work. right? you see these governors looking for some way to actively disassociate them from this disaster on the border. people are no longer content just to say, yeah, i disagree or just to criticize it. people -- however distantly they might be connected to this policy, they want to make sure they are pulling themselves back from, it doing what they can to not just criticize but undermine this policy. to ensure that they can't ever be blamed for having played some small part in it. canceled deployments and executive orders. like you saw today from massachusetts and colorado, those are the manifestations out in the country, out in the states today. but those efforts by those
governors to get the stink of this policy off them, that follows a little bit the same pattern of what's been happening in washington on this. i mean, the president is still trying to create an alternate reality in which this country somehow blames democrats for his administration's new policy. despite the fact that democrats are unanimously against it and it's his policy, he came up with it, and it's brand new. that alternate reality has a little bit of competition from several other trump administration alternate realities that have also been simultaneously floated by the administration. senior trump administration officials have variously tried to insist that there is no policy of separating kids from their parents at the border. like this statement last night from homeland security secretary kirstjen nielsen. the administration has also gone through a little spasm now of trying to blame their new policy on an old court ruling, a longstanding legal imperative that long pre-dated the trump administration in which they lament. that excuse suffers from the obvious short coming that if there really was some
longstanding law or court ruling that required this policy how is it possible that no previous president, no previous administration ever felt compelled by that law to do what the trump administration is doing now? but they're trying to come up with some way to talk about it, right? that keeps the stink off of them. it's interesting. with all the chaos in washington, denying it and blaming other people for it and lying about the origins of this policy, you shouldn't let that fuzziness in terms of the way it's being talked about politically, don't let that fuzziness, that deliberately created ambiguity about the origins of this policy create any doubt in your mind as to whether or not this policy actually is in effect. it is in effect. it is a new thing. it's something no other administration has done. and the talking about it in washington is wobbly as heck and getting wobblier every day, especially today. but on the ground the policy itself is in effect and importantly we now have very clear evidence that it is accelerating. on friday night on the show you
may remember we talked about the initial data we had from homeland security about the number of kids taken from their parents between april 19th and may 31st. that's when we had data. friday night we were able to report that between those two dates, just shy of 2,000 kids, 1,995 kids had been taken away from their parents between april 19th and may 31st. we now have a new set of data that extends the time frame through this weekend. and this is for the time period may 5th through june 9th. homeland security now says that in that period, 2,342 kids were forcibly taken away from their parents. and i know that just sounds like a jumble of numbers and dates, but what that means, bottom line, is that as of last month the trump administration was taking away an average of 46 kids per day from their parents. now, as of this month they're not taking 46 kids a day away from their parents. they're taking 67 kids a day away from their parents. 46 last month. 67 this month.
so given the mess they have made of this in washington and the fumbling, bumbling, cannot get their story straight, do not know what to admit messaging disaster they have got on this in washington, on the ground it's straightforward. this is in effect. it's getting bigger and faster all the time. 46 kids a day last month. 67 kids a day as of this month. they are scaling up. this weekend all over the country we saw democratic lawmakers turning up at immigration detention facilities trying to use their status as lawmakers to get access to some of these facilities, try to see firsthand what's going on there. yesterday on father's day there was a march on a facility in tornillo, texas, where they're holding kids essentially in a prison camp, holding kids in tents. they didn't announce until thursday that they had picked this site for a kids' prison camp. but then by the very next day, by friday, it was open and already accepting hundreds of kids. the sudden opening of that facility, the sudden publicity that that is where at least some
of these kids will be held led to this march yesterday, which included a number of elected officials, most from texas. but congressman joe kennedy was there as well from massachusetts. texas tribune ended up getting still images, as you can see, shot by one of their photographers. you can sort of tell these were shot from a distance. these are some of the only images that we've got of the kids inside these camps and jails, in this case this tent city. even as members of congress and senators have been demanding entry into some of these facilities and some of these facilities have started doing limited guided tours for select reporters. but nobody's been allowed to freely cover the conditions here or to talk to the kids. there are no cameras inside. we have been getting increasingly rich and emotionally resonant eyewitness reports from reporters who've been able to get in. from some advocates who've been able to get in to try to provide services or legal representation for some of these kids. but there hasn't been any
footage. then today there was a little bit of a breakthrough. there was a lot of anticipation around the white house press briefing today. press briefing is always a spectacle now. but on this issue of taking kids away from their parents, white house spokesperson sarah huckabee sanders had been getting particularly beat up in that briefing room about this policy. reporters had come at her on this very aggressively about the administration not telling the truth about this new policy, not coming up with a justification for what they're doing that seems to fit the magnitude of the trauma being inflicted on these families and on these little kids. last week we had reporters saying to sarah huckabee sanders in the briefing room, come on, sarah, you're a parent. and whatever you think of the white house spokesperson, that doesn't make it easy, right? for somebody who's handling a white house press briefing. nor is it easy when everybody else in the administration that you're supposedly speaking for has a different explanation for what's happening, right? there's kirstjen nielsen saying it's not our policy yesterday and then today saying it's congress' policy and there's the president saying yes, it's the policy but it's the democrats' policy.
and there's the attorney general saying, ohyeah, it is our policy. it's for deterrence, we've put this in place for a good reason. i mean, all these different explanations and denials and excuses and lies would make it hard for any white house spokesperson to come up with any sort of coherent answer to what you knew would be incredibly difficult questions from the press about this policy today. and then on top of that, by the time the press briefing was due to start today, all the living first ladies of the united states, every one of them, from melania trump to michelle obama to laura bush to hillary clinton to rosalind carter, they all put out statements by today in their own ways and their own language, their own emphasis, their own styles, but all of them criticizing this policy and saying it had to end. when's the last time all living first ladies of the united states criticized a current and new administration policy? that is an unusual moral chorus in this country for anybody to try to sing against. so it was clear that the press briefing wasn't going to be fun today for the white house. and then as the day got longer
today, you could just feel capitol hill, specifically you could start to feel the senate starting to just curdle on this. i'll give you a democratic example and a republican example. here's a sample from the democratic side first. >> i would welcome the resignation of all those in this administration who have lied for the president in terms of whether or not there is actually a policy to separate children from their parents at the border. we all know that is happening. and to lie about it just compounds the problem. all the people who have continued to lie for the president, i would welcome all of their resignations so this country can have a fresh start. >> laura bush compared the policy of having these camps and having these -- >> yes. >> -- places, likened it to the internment camps that used to happen -- or that there were in the united states from before. do you think that it's similar to that? >> i think the fact that laura bush called attention to that and the fact that 120,000 japanese-americans were -- let's not use the term intern.
they were incarcerated. they were put in places with barbed wire and guards with guns. that's what happened in this country. and we've been saying this should never happen again. but it is happening again. >> what would your message be to your republican colleagues in the senate who have said they oppose the idea of separating children from their parents? >> many more of them should speak up. and you know, i hate to call them what they are exemplifying. like gutless wonders. they need to step up and act like decent americans who understand the history of our country and the role that immigrants have played. not to mention, this is a party that continues to talk about how family unity and all of that is so important. the word hypocrisy doesn't even begin to describe the fact that more of them have not come forward and spoken out against this very cruel, unnecessary decision by the administration to rip apart these families. >> thank you. >> that's what it sounded like from the democratic side today, just to sample.
hawaii senator mazie hirono. here's a sample of what it sounded like from the republican side today. >> i've had many conversations with many of my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to see what we could come up with, but the fact is the administration has the authority to fix this immediately without legislation. nevertheless, there is -- well, there are multiple groups working on possible legislative fixes. >> secretary nielsen today said that congress alone has the authority to fix it. >> that is not the case. otherwise, how could the previous two administrations have rejected this approach? that's amazing that she said that. >> that's amazing that she said that. she doesn't mean amazing in a good way. republican senator susan collins of maine talking about the trump administration homeland security secretary.
i don't know how the trump administration thought it was going to go when they started wholesale removing children from their parents forcibly against the will of the parents and the children. it's not clear how much thought went into this at all. "new york times" now reports that parents separated from their children are in some cases being deported without their children even though that is not supposed to happen. they're being separated from their kids at the border. the u.s. government is keeping their kids and deporting the parents. "the new yorker" today has a devastating report which appears to show that there's no actual plan, that the government is even trying to implement, to get kids and parents back together in any sort of systematic way. "no protocols have been put in place for keeping track of parents and children concurrently, for keeping parents and children in contact with each other while they are separated or for eventually reuniting them. no protocols have been put in place for eventually reuniting parents with their children."
so it's not clear how much thought went into this, full stop. but the policy is accelerating. the outrage is snowballing to the point of avalanche. the white house and the administration clearly have no idea how to talk about this, how to answer any questions about what it is that they're doing. and then today, a remarkable thing happened. as the white house press briefing was set to start, we got what may turn out to be the straw that broke the camel's back. in the white house briefing room there's all those seats where reporters sit waiting for sarah huckabee sanders to come out. there's a previously scheduled white house briefing. today they're all sitting there waiting for her. reporters in the room all at the same time start getting the same alert in their e-mail inboxes on their phones. they all started clicking on the same link. they all started listening to a recording that had just been published by propublica. through all of the swelling outrage over this policy with even republican members of congress saying i can't believe this is happening, i can't believe this is being handled
this way, with politicians around the country joining marches, signing executive orders, canceling troop deployments, doing anything they can to distance themselves from this, as the national attention and outrage focused on this policy has built to a roar, all of this time there's been no footage. right? there's been distant telephoto lens still images. there's been written descriptions from reporters or to camera descriptions by reporters of what they've just seen but they can't show it to you yourself. all this time we have been left to imagine what it must be like, what those kids must be going through. until today. at propublica they finally published the first direct footage of what is actually happening in there. and as all those reporters were sitting there in the white house briefing room they all started clicking on the same link. they all started listening to this all at once. and then everybody else in the country started listening to this all at once and the propublica website crashed and the direct links to the audio started circulating as a secondary backup so more people
could hear it while propublica tried to deal with the traffic. and while the reporters were sitting there waiting for the white house press briefing to start, while they're listening to this thing that was just published by propublica, the white house press briefing got called off. at least for then. sarah huckabee sanders would not be appearing in public and answering anything about this today. instead they put the homeland security secretary on a plane from new orleans to have her come face those questions herself because this suddenly today became something that the white house communications shop could no longer handle in its tiny little hands. that audio and the reporter who broke that remarkable story is here with us next. stay with us. [ drum roll ] ...emily lapier from ames, iowa. this is emily's third nomination and first win. um...so, just...wow! um, first of all, to my fellow nominees, it is an honor sharing the road with you. and of course, to the progressive snapshot app for giving good drivers the discounts -- no, i have to say it --
for giving good drivers the discounts they deserve. safe driving! for giving good drivers the discounts they deserve. that's confident. but it's not kayak confident. kayak searches hundreds of travel and airline sites to find the best flight for me. so i'm more than confident. how's your family? kayak. search one and done. so, my portfolio did pretthat's great.year. but the market was up nearly twice as much. that's a tough pill to swallow. exactly. so i started trading. but with everything out there,
how do you know what to buy? well, i think my friend victor has just the thing for you. check this out, td ameritrade makes it easier to find the investments that might be right for you. like our etf comparison tool it lets you see how etfs measure up to one another. analyst ratings and past performance... nice. td ameritrade also offers access to coaches and a full education curriculum to help you improve your skills. that is cool. and if you still have any questions you can always chat with us on facebook or call our experienced service team, 24/7. yep. just because you're doing it yourself doesn't mean you're on your own. that's great. you're still up. alright. you're still up. if i knew you were gonna run the table i wouldn't have invited you over. call (866) 295-0917. act now to take advantage of commission-free trades for 90 days, plus get up to an $800 cash bonus when you open and fund a new account. ♪ proven to protect street skaters and freestylers. stops up to 97% uv. lasts through heat.
ginger thompson is a pulitzer prize-winning reporter who spent 15 years at "the new york times" as an investigative reporter, as a washington correspondent, as the mexico city bureau chief. she's now at propublica. and she is the reporter who obtained the first recording today from inside a customs and border patrol detention facility since the trump administration started implementing this new policy of taking kids away from their parents, which they're now apparently doing at a rate of nearly 70 children per day. thompson said she obtained this
recording from a texas lawyer who in turn says that she got it from a client who says it was recorded last week in a detention facility. now, on this recording you will hear kids crying here. you will hear kids crying for their mothers and their fathers. you will hear workers talking to them and trying to sort of figure out what to do with these kids. and you will also hear one very persistent sort of heartbreakingly persistent 6-year-old girl from el salvador whom propublica has identified by name and what she is asking for here is for someone to please call her aunt. she's 6 years old. she has memorized her aunt's phone number, and she's trying to get an adult, any adult, to help her, to call her family, to call the number she has memorized because she knows surely she should be picked up. she should not be there alone. [ crying children ]
>> remarkable audio today published by propublica. joining us now is ginger thompson. she's a senior reporter with propublica who today published that first footage, audio footage from inside one of these detention facilities where kids are being taken away from their parents and processed by workers who don't seem to quite know how to do it. ginger, thank you for being here. >> thank you. >> it's hard to hear. >> yes, it is. >> how did you get the audio? >> so we got a call from longtime sources of mine on the border about the fact that a civil rights attorney had a tape. and i called the attorney, talked to her about the tape. she described what was on it and told me how she had gotten the tape and that she wanted to share it. the lawyer did. because she felt that these were
the voices that were sort of missing in this debate. >> absolutely. literally missing. >> the children. >> we haven't heard from any of them. >> the people who have the most at stake in this debate. and so she shared it with me, and then we talked about the best ways to use the tape. and we decided to use the whole thing. >> is it illegal to have a recording from inside one of these facilities? i'm struck by the fact there's so much attention to what's going on there. and the thing that has been missing is anybody being able to talk to these kids, any moving images of what's going on there, any footage from the inside that's not taken by the authorities. >> well, it's unclear know that authorities in these centers can't have telephones or people who work in these centers with these children. right? but i think that what we have seen is that the administration when it tries -- when it offers to take the public into these places, those situations are very scripted, very controlled. so reporters have only been allowed in without cameras in most cases or very limited
cameras. they've not been able to talk to people who are detained in these facilities. so for the public, access to these facilities has been very controlled. >> we were able to focus on one kid in particular, a 6-year-old salvadoran girl. you were able to track down her family members in part because she -- it's a heartbreaking thing, that she's 6 years old, she's got this number memorized and that's essentially her lifeline to the outside world. are you able to tell us anything about her status? >> so, she apparently has been moved out of the border patrol facility where this recording was made and is now in a shelter that is run by health and human services, where she says that she has a bed, she's got good food. she still feels very alone. >> she's 6. >> she's 6. and authorities there have said to her that there's a chance her mother could be deported without her. so she's still quite
traumatized. >> that is -- i mean, part of learning that there are parents who are being deported without their kids. i mean, that's the u.s. government taking kids from their parents, keeping them. >> that's right. >> and forcibly sending the parent away. >> that's right. >> and there does not -- as far as we know, reporting from the "new yorker" today suggests there is no -- it's not that things are falling through the cracks or there's a patchwork system here that's not always working. it seems like there is no process for reuniting parents and kids once they're separated. is that true? >> well, from what i've heard from advocates and lawyers, this is not unusual, that a parent's case will move through the system very quickly. they will be deported. and their children are here. and then bureaucratically the system has to figure out how to put those two people back together. >> because they go by different agencies. they're certainly obviously in different geographic -- >> i've heard of separations that go on for months. months and months. >> ginger thompson, senior
reporter with propublica. congratulations on this scoop. this is serious stuff. thank you. it's really good to have you here. >> thank you. >> we'll be right back. stay with us. ow the friends of our friends. and we found others just like us. and just like that we felt a little less alone. but then something happened. we had to deal with spam, fake news, and data misuse. that's going to change. from now on, facebook will do more to keep you safe and protect your privacy. because when this place does what it was built for, then we all get a little closer. which is why i use armor tall ultra shine wash wipes.y. they effectively remove dirt, dust and grime with no water. that car is in tip top shape! we are both in tip top shape! armor all, it's easy to look good.
man: it takes a lot of work to run this business, but i really love it. i'm on the move all day long, and sometimes i don't eat the way i should. so i drink boost to get the nutrition i'm missing. boost high protein now has 33% more protein, along with 26 essential vitamins and minerals. and it has a guaranteed great taste. man: boost gives me everything i need to be up for doing what i love. boost high protein. be up for it.
boost high protein. at the marine mammal center, the environment is everything. we want to do our very best for each and every animal, and we want to operate a sustainable facility. and pg&e has been a partner helping us to achieve that. we've helped the marine mammal center go solar, install electric vehicle charging stations, and become more energy efficient. pg&e has allowed us to be the most sustainable organization we can be. any time you help a customer, it's a really good feeling. it's especially so when it's a customer that's doing such good and important work for the environment. together, we're building a better california. congressman beto o'rourke yesterday led a march to the tornillo, texas, makeshift campsite for separated kids, kids that have been taken away from their parents. it's near his el paso, texas, district. but congressman o'rourke if he
gets his way will be representing all of texas soon. he's running for the u.s. senate seat in texas that's currently held by u.s. senator ted cruz. congressman o'rourke, thank you very much for joining us tonight. nice to have you here. >> thanks for having me on. i appreciate it. >> i know where you were yesterday and you're here in new york today. what were you hoping to achieve with this tornillo march on father's day? >> you want to bring this to everyone's attention because some people say, this is not us, we would never do this, this isn't america. >> yeah. >> but we're doing this right now. it's being done in our name. and this is america. and so with 24 hours' notice we asked people to come out, bear witness in tornillo, not an easy place to get to. more than 1,000 came from not just el paso and new mexico, but from all over texas. salt lake city, denver. joe kennedy from boston, massachusetts. and they were there to make sure that we could answer this question. who is this country? in a better way than we are right now. we're not a country that is going to take kids from their parents after they have survived a 2,000-mile journey, fleeing the most brutal, the most
violent, the deadliest countries in this hemisphere if not the planet. we're a country that's going to make sure we follow our own laws. there's a lawful way to petition for asylum. and this young mother i was telling you about earlier who survived the journey from honduras with her 7-year-old daughter in the mcallen border control station, i said, why didn't you cross at the port of entry? she said, i was scared. >> the administration saying if you want asylum and cross at a point of entry we will not be separating parents and children. we'll only separate you if you cross at the wrong place. >> except now at the ports of entry there are customers officers standing at the international line not allowing you to set foot on u.s. soil so that you can lawfully petition for asylum, creating the perverse incentive to cross in between the ports of entry. we're literally saying there is no more room in the united states. >> they've closed the ports of entry and then told people unless you come through the port of entry we're taking your kid.
>> it's catch-22. what do you do? and if you have just survived that, if you know you are prey to the cartels in reynoso matamoros or ciudad juarez or you're going to have to find some way to get to this country, that's what i would do for my kids. that's what almost any human would do. we're punishing people, prosecuting them for being human and then taking their kids from them at their most vulnerable, their most desperate moment. later that day we went to a detention center where we met a man who'd fled guatemala with his 12-year-old girl, hadn't seen her in six days, through tears, through this plexiglas window we could barely hear each other through, he's asking me, where is she? then he says, deport me, i know i'll be killed, just make sure she stays in this country, i want to make sure she stays here and she's okay. so that's why we marched on tornillo. we've got to be there. we've got to own this. we've got to make this better. we're introducing legislation tomorrow that ends family separation in the united states. make sure that we honor not just our own laws. we have asylum laws on the book. but our best traditions, our best interests. who we are. at least who i tell my kids we are. we still have the chance to get this right. it's still within our power to do this.
>> you are running for senate and your opponent the incumbent senator ted cruz put out a statement today saying that he also supports ending family separation and blaming democrats for the policy, saying if democrats would only stop playing politics the problem could be solved. on the one hand i feel like if you and your opponent are both proposing an end to this policy then maybe we've got a toehold here. on the other hand, it seems like this is the same line that's being used by the president, who's justifying retaining the policy while saying that he hates it even though he's the one who invented and implemented it. >> yeah. this, to be clear, was a decision by president trump implemented by secretary nielsen. there should be no mistake about it. this is unprecedented. 100%, those young mothers, those young fathers with their young kids at our international border, where we connect with the rest of the world are being arrested, prosecuted like common criminals for a misdemeanor offense and having their children taken from them. and not knowing when and this is important, if they will ever see those kids again, and we know there are parents who have already been deported back to their countries of origin without their kids, not knowing
where their kids are. the president today, tonight, right now, this second, could make the decision that we are going to end this practice and honor our own asylum laws and do the right thing. failing that, congress must act. we have a bill tomorrow introduced in the house. we want republicans to join us as well. that ensures that we keep families together. that those families that do have to be separated for whatever reason are at least tracked so that we can rejoin them again at the end of their legal process. and that if you have a credible fear of returning to your country because they cannot protect you from death, from violence, from your child being raped or pressed into gang service, that you find a home here. that's our story. right? for more than 230 years. the o'rourkes found a home here. the gonzalezes found a home here. the lees. the people of the planet when there was nowhere else to go came here and made this country great. and we're about to lose it forever. >> are you confirming the reporting in "the new yorker" today that there isn't -- there isn't a protocol, there isn't a
system set up to track parents and children concurrently once they have been separated? are you confirming that? >> after we met that young mother with her 7-year-old daughter who had been arrested hours before and in hours were going to be separated, they didn't know that. i went to the processing center where you can see the kids in a 20 by 20-foot cyclone-fenced cages. given a tour by someone whose job title includes consequence delivery. >> the job title is consequence delivery? >> consequence delivery. and i said, how do you track these kids and these parents? she said we've got an alien number that we assign to that parent and that child. that number stays with them as long as they're in the custody of customs and border protection. mind you, that parent's about to be in the custody of department of justice for criminal prosecution. that child will go over to health and human services. >> hhs. >> and i said, does the a-number follow them there? she said i don't know. it's kind of like secretary nielsen tonight when asked about that said you've got to ask the people at hhs, that's not our job in our department. this is our job as americans in this country. we've got to get it right. >> congressman beto o'rourke of texas. thank you for being here. >> thank you. i really appreciate it.
you should be looking for a mortgage. you could mortgage in the dark... or know the steps with better. you could mortgage like it is 1970... or do it now with better. you could hope you are getting the best price... or know you are, with better. you could mortgage on their time... or with better, on yours. you could pay their commission... or mortgage with better, and save. go to better.com to mortgage right. start by finding out how much house you can actually afford in just three minutes.
if you spit blood you may have gum problems,s and could be on the journey to much worse. try parodontax toothpaste. it's clinically proven to remove plaque, the main cause of bleeding gums. for healthy gums and strong teeth. leave bleeding gums behind with parodontax toothpaste. honestly, the trump administration has brought with it a number of shocks, things that somehow just feel hard to process. and we are living through these things. and so we don't disbelieve that these things are happening. but they are shocking. so much that it's almost surreal. there's sort of an element of, pinch me, is this really my country? one of those things early on was
the muslim ban. president trump really was elected president after calling publicly for a complete and total shutdown of muslims entering this country. when he got elected after proposing that, that proposal became policy with a list of mostly muslim countries not allowed to come here anymore. then there's another one. we're living through a crest of new moral outrage now over another one of these hallmarks of the trump administration, the newly barbaric treatment of parents and young kids at the border. immigrants have never been treated awesomely at the american border, but there is now this newly barbaric policy of taking screaming kids away from their parents with no plan for how to get them back together. it's destabilizing to us as individual people. and i think to us as americans overall to have things happening that we sort of keep telling each other this isn't really happening. being dislocated and shocked by radical things happening in our country offers a challenge to
each of us which is that we sort of have to find a way to keep our bearings, to remember where the horizon is sometimes, right? here's one way to keep your bearings in one small way. you know the flint water crisis? overwhelmingly a terrible news story. right? the emblematic environmental and public health disaster of our day. an entire city's children lead poisoned when state-appointed emergency managers switch the city's water source without taking proper precautions or proper treatment, thus turning the very plumbing of the city of flint into a lead delivery device for its people. the reason we know about flint and the person who pulled the plug on that story, the person who made it start to stop happening, that person is an iraqi american. an immigrant, first generation, who more than anyone is the biggest hero of that crisis. in the summer of 2015 she was a pediatrician at a public hospital in flint. she'd seen reporting about high levels of lead in the water. people started talking about it.
but this wasn't, it turns out, a slow creeping problem where flint, this poor city, had bad infrastructure and it was growing into a long-term problem. what happened in flint seemed to have happened suddenly, seemed to have been caused by a specific policy change, and nobody in charge was getting it. the state was denying it. county was denying it. but this one doctor decided they at least had to know if it was hurting kids, the kids who she treated as a pediatrician in the public hospital in town. she set up a study and started testing kids' blood samples from before and after flint changed the source of its drinking water. she got no funding for this study. she and one other researcher and residents, medical residents, just took it on on top of their other work. they looked at all the lab results they had access to. they went through an academic and medical approvals process to get access to even more lab results so they could get a big enough sample size so they could make sense of what was happening. and that is when they realized what they had. that's when they realized they
had proof that something absolutely terrifying was happening. and the state was like, oh, no, you don't. that can't possibly be true. and the county was like, oh, no, you don't, you shouldn't talk about this anymore. and when the hero of this story, this first-generation iraqi-american immigrant doctor, gave a press conference to alert everybody that, you guys, flint's kids are showing elevated levels of lead in their blood, this is real, nearly twice as many kids as before the switch, when she did that, even the freaking medical school that she was associated with was like, hey, doc, we love you but we can't stand next to you on this, we don't want to be associated with this research. okay? too scary to say something that big. but this doctor went ahead anyway. and that is ultimately what pulled the plug. that is how this country started to reckon with the fact that an american state had poisoned one of its own cities. now, that pediatrician is still there. the damage to flint's water was done and is not yet fixed. the damage to the people of
flint was done and has not yet been fixed. but she's still there and she's trying to fix that, too. dr. mona hanna-attisha is here tonight for our interview. she's here next. today... back pain can't win. now introducing aleve back and muscle pain. only aleve targets tough pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. ♪ aleve back & muscle. all day strong. all day long.
the world is full of different hair. that's why pantene has the perfect conditioners for everyone. from air-light foam, to nourishing 3 minute miracle, to the moisture-infusing gold series. we give more women great hair days - every day. pantene. need a change of scenery? the kayak price forecast tool tells you
american city." dr. mona hanna-attisha is a pediatrician in flint. she shook the denial off the flint story and made people face what was going on there. congratulations on the book. thank you for being here. >> thank you for having me. it's good to be back. >> i wanted to ask first of all about why you wanted to write a book about this. the reason i wanted to ask you is you are busy. not only were you busy before flint, since then you got a lot of national attention and a big platform you've been using for good but you're still trying to fix flint. >> i'm still a pediatrician in flint. i decided to write it for three reasons. one, when i started to write the book, i knew we would need a vehicle to shine the spotlight back on flint. the nation's attention would fade but our crisis and needs would be ongoing. we needed a reminder that flint is still here. it's still on bottled water. you need to pay attention to flint.
the second reason is, i wanted an immigrant story of an arab-american that wasn't about war and terrorism. it was about immigrant coming to this country fleeing oppression, i was that little brown girl and i acclimated to this country and achieved the american dream, what are we losing out of right now. and i also wanted to write the book as a way to give back. part of the proceeds go to our flint kids fund. we have a lot of long term work to do and i want to make sure we can do that. >> i think of the original iteration of muslim ban and iraq would be one of them -- >> i wouldn't be here. >> and lord knows what would have happened to flint by now. >> absolutely. >> in terms of what's happening in the city right now. there was a little bit of burst of national publicity recently when the state announced it wasn't going to support bottled water. what's going on now? >> it's being supported by
nonprofits, some churches. but the recommendation is still to be on bottled or filtered water. we're doing massive infrastructure work. we've replaced about 6,000 of our lead pipes, we have about 9,000 to go. until the infrastructure work is complete, people need to stay on filtered and bottled water. >> the way we got to the story in the first place on this show way back in the day, was that we had been covering the emergency manager law in michigan where your locally elected officials can be pushed aside, taken out of all decision making process and the government, the governor specifically can say we're not going to recognize the results of your local elections anymore, we're going to do it our way because we know what's best. that's part of the flint water crisis story because it was an emergency manager who was in charge when the switch was made. how's democracy? that's a big part of how you tell the story about what went wrong. >> absolutely. kudos to you, rachel, you were
the first to elevate that issue of democracy. you were on the story before it was a water crisis story. so thank you, we would be nowhere without you. in 2011, flint lost democracy overnight. we had a state appointed emergency manager in charge and their only job was to save money. no matter what the cost. and it was too expensive, i guess, for us to get great lakes treated water. instead we got it from the flint river and it wasn't treated properly. all of this happened because of usurped democracy. it was taken away from people. at one point in michigan half of our african-american population was under emergency management compared to 2% of whites. and that does not sound democratic to me. >> which means you don't have power to elect your local officials. >> you can't hold them accountable either. >> she's the author of a new book. "what the eyes don't see." you give me hope.
great to see you, my friend. >> thank you, rachel. >> we'll be right back. stay with us. i brought you something. okay. whaa! am i dead? not yet kid. aahh! if i don't make it back, remember you're the one that made me come here. i'll be alright. [ roar ] rated pg-13. gary: i've been making blades here at gillette for 20 years. i bet i'm the first blade maker you've ever met. there's a lot of innovation that goes into making our thinnest longest lasting blades on the market. precision machinery and high quality materials from around the world. nobody else even comes close. it's about delivering a more comfortable shave, every time. invented in boston. made and sold around the world. order now at gilletteondemand.com. gillette, the best a man can get.
like concert tickets or a new snowboard. matt: whoo! whoo! jen: but that all changed when we bought a house. matt: voilà! jen: matt started turning into his dad. matt: mm. that's some good mulch. ♪ i'm awake. but it was pretty nifty when jen showed me how easy it was to protect our home and auto with progressive. [ wrapper crinkling ] get this butterscotch out of here. progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents. there's quite a bit of work, 'cause this was all -- this was all stapled. but we can protect your home and auto when you bundle with us. at this time on friday night's show i broke the news that i planned to spend most of the weekend in a canoe for the first time in my life. i'm here to report back, it worked. i got the canoe, susan me around because i couldn't make it go. there you go. closing the loop on that story. now i'm a canoe owner. ahead tonight on lawrence's
show, one pioneering u.s. lawmaker who was among the first people in elected office to knock on doors and demand answers and access on the border for this policy of separating kids from their parents is u.s. senator jeff merkley of oregon he's been at this from the beginning. he's joining lawrence you don't want to miss that. that's does it for me tonight now it's time for "the last word with lawrence o'donnell" good evening. >> good evening. the reporter you had on in your hour changed our understanding of this story again. there's been heroic reporting coming out of the southern border but that audio she was able to make of those children under those conditions is like nothing we've heard before. >> there will be an ongoing fight to get visuals beyond